I just finished reading
Diary of a Bad Year by
J. M. Coetzee, a South African who won the 2003 Nobel Prize for Literature and now lives in Australia.
Rarely do I see novels that use any other format other than the traditional visual and structural layout of chapter title followed by the text, one page following another in the same manner. Yet Cotzee used a format I've never seen. Both the novelty of the formatting and the rarity of such risk-taking on the part of the author proved fascinating, both visually and intellectually.
The book revolves around an elderly German writer who's asked to write a book of essays conveying his opinions about whatever he wants. A lonely and isolated man who lives in an urban high-rise in Australia, he's charmed by a petite young woman of 29 who lives in the same building. He offers her a job as his typist. Besides his opinions, we see his interaction with the woman, first through his eyes and then through hers.
Structurally, Coetzee places the writer's essay at the top of each page. This essay might be only one page long, or run for several pages. But again, the essay only takes up the top half of every page.
Below the essay portion, Coetzee places the writer's personal thoughts. Again, these thoughts might be only one paragraph long, or extend for several pages.
At the very bottom of each page, Coetzee places the woman's personal thoughts, including her interaction with her jealous boyfriend.
Here's a visual example of each page (the words are mine, since I don't have an example of the book at hand):
About Elections
In the world of politics there are XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
_____________________________________________________________
He knew he couldn't appear too eager. That doing so might
frighten her, or worse, disgust her. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
____________________________________________________________
He said he needed a typist, but of course she didn't believe that.
He could easily hire someone from the agency down the block,
and for a lot cheaper. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
What's so interesting about this shakeup from the norm is that after the initial confusion, you feel a real thrill of excitement in figuring out what's going on, i.e., who's talking and how the relationship begins to change. Then throughout the book you have to make decisions. Should you read the essay through to the end and flip back to the personal thoughts, or should you read each page in its entirety, which requires you to jump from one section/one character to another, the effect similar to chatting with people online, in that rather than hearing each person to the conclusion of his/her thoughts, comments leapfrog. Answers come before questions and comments straggle in long after the subject has changed.
The lesson is clear. Just by changing the visual look of a page you'll challenge your readers to think in a new way. So long as you have a good reason for using an unconventional format and you hold to a steady rule of usage — the top of the page is always reserved for the essay, for example, or that the formatting reflects one particular character's frame of mind — your readers will not only catch on to what you're doing but experience the thrill of discovery.
Have you ever experimented in this manner? How did you change the format? What was the result?
Happy writing!